Food Packaging Should Have Labels On Front About Health Impact, Says WHO
Packaged food and drinks should have easy-to-read nutritional information on the front of the products to help consumers make healthier choices, according to the first-ever World Health Organisation draft guidelines that stopped short of recommending harsher warning labels.
Increased consumption of processed foods high in salt, sugar and fat is a key driver of a global obesity crisis, with more than a billion people living with the condition and an estimated eight million early deaths every year due to associated health problems like diabetes and heart disease, WHO data shows.
Yet governments have struggled to introduce policies to curb the epidemic. Currently, only 43 WHO member states have any kind of front-of-package labelling either mandatory or voluntary, the UN agency told Reuters, despite evidence showing labels can affect buying behaviour.
The WHO began work on the draft guidelines, which have not been previously reported, in 2019. They aim “to support consumers in making healthier food-related decisions,” Katrin Engelhardt, a scientist in the Nutrition and Food Safety department of the WHO, told Reuters by email.
A public consultation on the guidelines closed on 11 October and the finalised version will be released in early 2025.
‘Interpretive’ Labels
The WHO’s guidance recommends governments implement ‘interpretive’ labels that include nutritional information and some explanation of what that means about the healthiness of a product.
An example would be NutriScore, developed in France and used in a number of European countries, which ranks food from A (green, containing essential nutrients) to E (red, containing high levels of added salts, sugars, fats or calories).
Chile and several other countries in Latin America use a tougher system, with warnings that a food is “high in sugar”, salt or fat on the front of the package, in a black octagon that resembles a stop sign.
Research this summer by Taillie showed Chile’s warning labels, alongside other policies like marketing restrictions to children, meant Chileans bought 37% less sugar, 22% less sodium, 16% less saturated fat and 23% fewer total calories compared to if the law had not been implemented.
ESM
Related news
International coalition calls for ban on aspartame
The European Commission and EU member states are under increasing…
Read more >The United States is leaving the World Health Organization
The United States is withdrawing from the World Health Organization…
Read more >Food Labels May Fool EU Consumers, New Report Warns
Consumers can easily get lost in a maze of food…
Read more >Related news
foodora: Condoms are being ordered as early as 7am on Valentine’s Day
Florists are busy, but many people also order chocolate and…
Read more >The growth of Hungarian e-commerce is now driven by imports
In 2024, the entire Hungarian e-commerce market, based on PwC’s…
Read more >Chamber of Commerce’s little smart guy helps producers involved in farm transfers
The National Chamber of Agriculture has prepared a guide for…
Read more >