CSAOSZ: here is the evaluation of the level of the EPR fee items, in the light of the items of the environmental protection product fee
In the 81st issue of the Magyar Közlöny, published on June 2, 2023, the ministerial decree determining the fees for extended producer responsibility was released with a two-day delay compared to the promised deadline.
Here are all the details:
Among the fees specified in the decree, it can be observed that those related to packaging show an increase of 1.17 to 9.79 times compared to the fees applied so far to packaging materials, which only partially served the fulfillment of environmental objectives, as defined in the Environmental Product Fee Act.
According to data from the National Tax and Customs Administration (NAV), out of the 42.5 million Hungarian forints of product fees paid for packaging materials in 2021, the state budget planned a net expenditure of 6.9 million Hungarian forints for recycling, according to the Public Service Non-profit Company for Hungarian Waste Management (OGyHT).
In contrast, the annual EPR (extended producer responsibility) fee obligation for packaging emissions is expected to reach 240 million Hungarian forints.
Based on the knowledge of the fees, the following conclusions can be drawn:
The actual costs of waste management, which have been partially supervised and financed by the state since 2012, are not known to the government, or if they are known, they are disregarded; otherwise, such a significant fee increase could not have been approved.
With the amendment of the Environmental Product Fee Act in 2022, the Government implied to economic actors that environmental financial burdens would not increase since the EPR fee can be deducted from the product fee. However, it added as a side note that if the EPR exceeds the product fee, the payable amount would be 0 HUF/kg.
The question arises whether the legislator misled economic actors or lost control and supervision in determining the EPR fees.
Based on the decree, it can be stated that the regulation on environmental product fees has become obsolete and its maintenance is merely an administrative burden for both the economy and the tax authority.
Due to the forced introduction of a non-EU conforming concession system and the resulting lack of preparation, the fees were determined from unchecked and unaudited initial data.
Related news
Paper packaging may not be the best
The environmental effects of packaging are receiving more and more…
Read more >There are serious sustainability issues with packaging in e-commerce
With the rise of online shopping, the optimization of packaging…
Read more >Smurfit Kappa ushers in a new era in sustainable packaging
The Smurfit Kappa Group, the global leader in paper-based packaging,…
Read more >Related news
“To the bin with food waste” – the Nébih No Leftovers program announces a poster design competition
On the occasion of the Sustainability Theme Week, the program…
Read more >Primark is preparing for a major innovation
Primark, the international fashion department store, will open its first…
Read more >Paper packaging may not be the best
The environmental effects of packaging are receiving more and more…
Read more >