CSAOSZ: here is the evaluation of the level of the EPR fee items, in the light of the items of the environmental protection product fee
In the 81st issue of the Magyar Közlöny, published on June 2, 2023, the ministerial decree determining the fees for extended producer responsibility was released with a two-day delay compared to the promised deadline.
Here are all the details:
Among the fees specified in the decree, it can be observed that those related to packaging show an increase of 1.17 to 9.79 times compared to the fees applied so far to packaging materials, which only partially served the fulfillment of environmental objectives, as defined in the Environmental Product Fee Act.
According to data from the National Tax and Customs Administration (NAV), out of the 42.5 million Hungarian forints of product fees paid for packaging materials in 2021, the state budget planned a net expenditure of 6.9 million Hungarian forints for recycling, according to the Public Service Non-profit Company for Hungarian Waste Management (OGyHT).
In contrast, the annual EPR (extended producer responsibility) fee obligation for packaging emissions is expected to reach 240 million Hungarian forints.
Based on the knowledge of the fees, the following conclusions can be drawn:
The actual costs of waste management, which have been partially supervised and financed by the state since 2012, are not known to the government, or if they are known, they are disregarded; otherwise, such a significant fee increase could not have been approved.
With the amendment of the Environmental Product Fee Act in 2022, the Government implied to economic actors that environmental financial burdens would not increase since the EPR fee can be deducted from the product fee. However, it added as a side note that if the EPR exceeds the product fee, the payable amount would be 0 HUF/kg.
The question arises whether the legislator misled economic actors or lost control and supervision in determining the EPR fees.
Based on the decree, it can be stated that the regulation on environmental product fees has become obsolete and its maintenance is merely an administrative burden for both the economy and the tax authority.
Due to the forced introduction of a non-EU conforming concession system and the resulting lack of preparation, the fees were determined from unchecked and unaudited initial data.
Related news
NAV Audit Trends in 2024: Lessons and Focus Areas of Transfer Pricing Data Provision
The regulatory and practical challenges of transfer pricing were analyzed…
Read more >NAV: Several pounds of frozen food found in a Budapest warehouse was destroyed
Among spare tires, used furniture and clothes, the financial inspectors…
Read more >Sustainable packaging: focus on recycling and the circular economy
Packaging is a key element of the supply chain, where…
Read more >Related news
The latest issue of Trade magazine is out now!
This time the digital version has been extended to 192…
Read more >After a subdued year, the holiday season is strong
74% of online shoppers, around 3.1 million people, are preparing…
Read more >Lidl has published its 3rd sustainability report
Lidl Hungary’s sustainability report for the 2022/2023 business years has…
Read more >