CSAOSZ: here is the evaluation of the level of the EPR fee items, in the light of the items of the environmental protection product fee
In the 81st issue of the Magyar Közlöny, published on June 2, 2023, the ministerial decree determining the fees for extended producer responsibility was released with a two-day delay compared to the promised deadline.
Here are all the details:
Among the fees specified in the decree, it can be observed that those related to packaging show an increase of 1.17 to 9.79 times compared to the fees applied so far to packaging materials, which only partially served the fulfillment of environmental objectives, as defined in the Environmental Product Fee Act.
According to data from the National Tax and Customs Administration (NAV), out of the 42.5 million Hungarian forints of product fees paid for packaging materials in 2021, the state budget planned a net expenditure of 6.9 million Hungarian forints for recycling, according to the Public Service Non-profit Company for Hungarian Waste Management (OGyHT).
In contrast, the annual EPR (extended producer responsibility) fee obligation for packaging emissions is expected to reach 240 million Hungarian forints.
Based on the knowledge of the fees, the following conclusions can be drawn:
The actual costs of waste management, which have been partially supervised and financed by the state since 2012, are not known to the government, or if they are known, they are disregarded; otherwise, such a significant fee increase could not have been approved.
With the amendment of the Environmental Product Fee Act in 2022, the Government implied to economic actors that environmental financial burdens would not increase since the EPR fee can be deducted from the product fee. However, it added as a side note that if the EPR exceeds the product fee, the payable amount would be 0 HUF/kg.
The question arises whether the legislator misled economic actors or lost control and supervision in determining the EPR fees.
Based on the decree, it can be stated that the regulation on environmental product fees has become obsolete and its maintenance is merely an administrative burden for both the economy and the tax authority.
Due to the forced introduction of a non-EU conforming concession system and the resulting lack of preparation, the fees were determined from unchecked and unaudited initial data.
Related news
Everything from one place: Auchan is also worth going to for Christmas gifts
At the end of the year, we not only buy…
Read more >The future of the food industry: 50% of companies aim to implement sustainable solutions – Tetra Pak survey results
Food production continues to rely on energy-intensive processes and fossil…
Read more >Unmarked eggs found in a van on the M5 motorway
More than sixty thousand unmarked eggs were seized by the…
Read more >Related news
Quick commerce booms in India as consumers seek faster deliveries
The demand is particularly high amongst younger consumers. Quick commerce…
Read more >REWE Group Revamps Digital Loyalty Programmes
REWE Group has announced a new format for its digital…
Read more >Lactalis to close factory in Zambia
The dairy group has cited “market dynamics”, according to a…
Read more >