Feminine hygiene is still considered a luxury in Hungary
While several EU member states have already reduced VAT on feminine hygiene products to zero, Hungary still charges the highest rate of 27% on essential items such as tampons and sanitary napkins. The latest episode of NAPICSÁRT examines the economic and social effects of the “pink tax” phenomenon – with specific examples, price differences and a European comparison.
A basic need, with a luxury tax
Menstrual products represent an expense of several thousand forints for households every month. An average menstruating woman spends about 42 thousand forints on them per year, and this amount increases further if we include intimate hygiene products, painkillers or special underwear. All this with a VAT rate of 27%, while in Poland it is only 5%, in Austria 10%, in France 5.5% and in Ireland it is zero.
The Hungarian government has introduced a temporary mark-up cap on feminine hygiene and cosmetic products in drugstores from May 19, 2025, capping retailers’ profits at 15% compared to the January level or 15% – whichever is lower. However, this is only a partial relief, as the high VAT rate remains in force.
Pink tax: price difference by gender
The term “pink tax” is not an official tax type, but a market phenomenon that refers to the fact that products intended for women are often more expensive than their male counterparts with the same function. The difference is often only in color or fragrance – but the price is significantly different. In the case of razors, shower gels, shampoos, body lotions, and even ballpoint pens, women’s versions are often overpriced. Manufacturers are building on the fact that women are conscious, regular buyers who are willing to pay more for beauty products – and the NAPICSÁRT program shows the impact of this with concrete examples.
Growing market – growing burdens?
The global feminine hygiene products market reached $25 billion in 2023 and is forecast to grow to $39 billion by 2033. Part of the reason for this growth is the rise of sustainable, reusable and biodegradable products. However, these are often still difficult to access or much more expensive, so they are not a realistic alternative for many consumers.
The question is not only serious from an economic but also a social point of view: is it justified that the costs of ensuring basic bodily hygiene represent additional expenses for women? It’s not just consumers who need to find the answer – regulators and manufacturers also have a role to play in ensuring that women’s needs are not considered a luxury, but a fundamental right in the future.
Related news
Monthly affair, shared responsibility: by shopping at Tesco we can help those who cannot afford menstrual products
On May 28, World Menstrual Hygiene Day, Tesco drew attention…
Read more >DM helps make intimate hygiene products accessible to as many people as possible
dm is committed to supporting women’s health and continues to…
Read more >Men are rediscovering the traditional solution
Shaving is not only an indispensable part of the morning…
Read more >Related news
GKI analysis: Why do Hungarian households live more poorly than anyone else in the EU?
Imagine that the residents of every EU country shop in…
Read more >KSH: industrial producer prices decreased by 0.7 percent in May 2025 compared to the previous month, and increased by an average of 6.9 percent compared to a year earlier
In May 2025, industrial producer prices were 6.9 percent higher…
Read more >Consumption drives the economy
According to the latest forecast by the Balance Institute, the…
Read more >