Penny’s “True Cost” campaign: A Surprising Impact on Consumer Behavior
In a bold move, Penny implemented a “True Cost” campaign for a week, incorporating the cost of environmental damages into product prices. Contrary to expectations, a study conducted by the Nuremberg Institute of Technology and the University of Greifswald revealed that the sales figures did not drop as significantly as anticipated during this unique pricing experiment.
The study involved 2,255 individuals who were surveyed before and after the campaign week to understand their purchasing behavior. Late July 2023, Penny applied the “true” prices to nine selected products, reflecting the actual costs thereof when considering all environmental damages incurred during production. This led to price increases of up to 94 percent, with bio-products receiving lower surcharges.
Surprisingly, the study found that the sales did not plummet as much as feared, what the authors attributed to effective communication and associated with a tendency to charity. Approximately 84 percent of customers who purchased the products despite the price hike cited charity as a significant motivation.
The extra revenue generated during the campaign was donated to a climate protection and family-owned farms preservation project in the Alpine region, an initiative by the Rewe Group.
Nationwide product sales declined, however, with price sensitivity being a key factor, as 85 percent of respondents deemed the prices too high. In the new federal states, the decline was particularly pronounced, reaching up to 70 percent. Conversely, sales in the western and southern regions of Germany decreased to a comparatively smaller extent, often not exceeding 50 percent. Researchers suggest regional disparities may arise from differing income levels and varying degrees of interest in sustainability.
According to the study, 64 percent of respondents were aware of Penny’s True Cost campaign, with half of them claiming that it raised awareness about the actual costs of food production. However, 46 percent perceived the campaign as mere marketing without tangible positive effects.
Post-campaign, estimates of true costs increased for both initially overestimated and underestimated products, indicating that participants realized the actual costs were higher than initially assumed.
Related news
Grilling season in PENNY stores: more flavours, greater choice in 2025!
This year PENNY is presenting an even more appealing selection…
Read more >This is how PENNY’s opening hours will be on May 1st
PENNY stores will be closed on May 1st, and will…
Read more >REWE Earmarks €3bn To Expand Penny In Romania
German retail group REWE has announced a €3 billion, ten-year…
Read more >Related news
Márton Nagy: the government would introduce margin restrictions for stores selling household goods
The government may discuss on Wednesday and is expected to…
Read more >The Hungarian Food Bank Association is organizing a record-sized food collection on Friday and Saturday
At the Friday and Saturday fundraiser organized by the Hungarian…
Read more >Pick Szeged Zrt.’s profit decreased, but its sales revenue increased last year
Pick Szeged Zrt.’s after-tax profit in 2024 was 6.7 billion…
Read more >