Penny’s “True Cost” campaign: A Surprising Impact on Consumer Behavior
In a bold move, Penny implemented a “True Cost” campaign for a week, incorporating the cost of environmental damages into product prices. Contrary to expectations, a study conducted by the Nuremberg Institute of Technology and the University of Greifswald revealed that the sales figures did not drop as significantly as anticipated during this unique pricing experiment.
The study involved 2,255 individuals who were surveyed before and after the campaign week to understand their purchasing behavior. Late July 2023, Penny applied the “true” prices to nine selected products, reflecting the actual costs thereof when considering all environmental damages incurred during production. This led to price increases of up to 94 percent, with bio-products receiving lower surcharges.
Surprisingly, the study found that the sales did not plummet as much as feared, what the authors attributed to effective communication and associated with a tendency to charity. Approximately 84 percent of customers who purchased the products despite the price hike cited charity as a significant motivation.
The extra revenue generated during the campaign was donated to a climate protection and family-owned farms preservation project in the Alpine region, an initiative by the Rewe Group.
Nationwide product sales declined, however, with price sensitivity being a key factor, as 85 percent of respondents deemed the prices too high. In the new federal states, the decline was particularly pronounced, reaching up to 70 percent. Conversely, sales in the western and southern regions of Germany decreased to a comparatively smaller extent, often not exceeding 50 percent. Researchers suggest regional disparities may arise from differing income levels and varying degrees of interest in sustainability.
According to the study, 64 percent of respondents were aware of Penny’s True Cost campaign, with half of them claiming that it raised awareness about the actual costs of food production. However, 46 percent perceived the campaign as mere marketing without tangible positive effects.
Post-campaign, estimates of true costs increased for both initially overestimated and underestimated products, indicating that participants realized the actual costs were higher than initially assumed.
Related news
You can now order from PENNY to your home for a month now!
“It’s been more than a month since we started home…
Read more >Retailer of the Year 2024 winners announced
For the 10th time Trade magazin has invited points of sale…
Read more >Penny’s ‘Markthalle’ discount concept in Germany
Penny’s marketplace concept in Germany is an evolutionary step towards…
Read more >Related news
Master Good, Nestlé Hungária, Tesco Hungary are this year’s winners
This year, Trade Magazine announced the Christmas TV Ads 2024…
Read more >This year’s CO-OP Star Silver Pine and Silver Star awards have been presented
As every year before Christmas, this December, the CO-OP Star…
Read more >Declining company numbers, permanent half-million limit
In 2024, the number of partnerships is expected to decrease…
Read more >